11 found
Order:
  1.  96
    Philanthropy as strategy when corporate charity “begins at home”.David H. Saiia, Archie B. Carroll & Ann K. Buchholtz - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (2):169-201.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   95 citations  
  2.  40
    Beyond Resources The Mediating Effect of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy.Ann K. Buchholtz, Allen C. Amason & Matthew A. Rutherford - 1999 - Business and Society 38 (2):167-187.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  3.  71
    The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting.Archie B. Carroll, Ann K. Buchholtz & Kareem M. Shabana - 2017 - Business and Society 56 (8):1107-1135.
    This article presents a three-stage model of how isomorphic mechanisms have shaped corporate social responsibility reporting practices over time. In the first stage, defensive reporting, companies fail to meet stakeholder expectations due to a deficiency in firm performance. In this stage, the decision to report is driven by coercive isomorphism as firms sense pressure to close the expectational gap. In the second stage, proactive reporting, knowledge of CSR reporting spreads and the practice of CSR reporting becomes normatively sanctioned. In this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  4.  60
    New Directions in Corporate Governance and Finance.Lori Verstegen Ryan, Ann K. Buchholtz & Robert W. Kolb - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4):673-694.
    Corporate governance and finance are dynamic academic fields that offer myriad opportunities for business ethics analysis. Within the corporate governance triad in recent years, shareholders have increased their power over boards of directors and executives through both regulation and movements to change corporate by-laws. The impact of board characteristics on firm performance has proven elusive, leading to questions concerning board processes and individual director beliefs and behaviors. At the same time, CEOs have lost considerable power, leaving many struggling to regain (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5. Does Philanthropy Begin at Home? The Strategic Motivations Underlying Corporate Giving Programs.David Saiia, Archie B. Carroll & Ann K. Buchholtz - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (2):169-201.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  6.  36
    Moral Salience and the Role of Goodwill in Firm-Stakeholder Trust Repair.Jill A. Brown, Ann K. Buchholtz & Paul Dunn - 2016 - Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (2):181-199.
    ABSTRACT:Re-establishing trust presents a complex challenge for a firm after it commits corporate misconduct. We introduce a new construct, moral salience, which we define as the extent to which the firm’s behavior is morally noticeable to the stakeholder. Moral salience is a function of both the moral intensity of the firm’s behavior and the relational intensity of the firm-stakeholder psychological contract. We apply this moral salience construct to firm misconduct to develop a model of trust repair that is based on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  49
    Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance.Ann K. Buchholtz - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):177-193.
    Abstract:Shareholders’ relationship to the firm is a central theme in corporate governance, yet the investors’ perspective has been virtually ignored in governance research. This paper attempts to explain the previously unexplored role of trust in the investor decision-making process. The proposed model suggests that trust acts as the antecedent of the risk variable in existing investor decision-making models. Stock ownership involves both financial and ethical risk, which by definition requires some level of implicit trust in management and the market.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  8.  37
    Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance.Lori Verstegen Ryan & Ann K. Buchholtz - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):177-193.
    Abstract:Shareholders’ relationship to the firm is a central theme in corporate governance, yet the investors’ perspective has been virtually ignored in governance research. This paper attempts to explain the previously unexplored role of trust in the investor decision-making process. The proposed model suggests that trust acts as the antecedent of the risk variable in existing investor decision-making models. Stock ownership involves both financial and ethical risk, which by definition requires some level of implicit trust in management and the market.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  9.  22
    The Chlorine Spill of 2005 Case Study.Jill A. Brown & Ann K. Buchholtz - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:495-496.
    This case study reviews a train crash that occurred in January 2005 when a Norfolk Southern freight train struck a parked train on the tracks near Graniteville, South Carolina. At issue is the safe transportation of hazardous materials, the assignment of responsibility, the stakeholder management of participants and the outcome to Avondale Mills, a local textile company that ended up closing its doors after the spill.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Corporate governance.Ann K. Buchholtz - 2018 - In Eugene Heath, Byron Kaldis & Alexei M. Marcoux (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Business Ethics. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  26
    Corporate Philanthropy Research.Ann K. Buchholtz & Jill A. Brown - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:70-71.
    Individual studies have contributed to our knowledge of corporate philanthropy, but to date they remain fragmented. We proposed to extricate the conceptual and empirical work in corporate social responsibility from the conceptual and empirical work on corporate philanthropy, limiting our review to works that specifically refer to corporate philanthropy, as well as works that are labeled as corporate social responsibility but actually operationalize it as philanthropy. We will present an integrative model of corporate philanthropy research that draws on research from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation